Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:23:39 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -kthread Message-ID: <20030120082339.GC92001@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <002601c2c029$a0063a30$e602a8c0@shara.net> References: <000b01c2bfc0$8ed86e90$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119144233.GA1056@graf.pompo.net> <007901c2bfd0$3ee5de30$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119230901.GA89120@rot13.obsecurity.org> <002601c2c029$a0063a30$e602a8c0@shara.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >-kthread is not supported.
>
> Shouldn't it be removed from the gcc man page then?
Probably. Submit a PR.
> (just curious: has it ever worked, and why was it removed?)
No. An improved (relative to other OSes) kernel threading system is
being developed in the 5.0 branch ("KSE").
Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+K7ILWry0BWjoQKURAnETAJ44k8sm3rsDPys/Vifivsj64+HAXQCg/P6Q
Kw7DCusfPQZEz8QKn2ajMtU=
=a/ve
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030120082339.GC92001>