Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:16:52 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu Cc: mike@FreeBSD.ORG, standards@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@zeta.org.au Subject: Re: fpclassify() for review Message-ID: <20030207.151652.38309440.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200302071825.h17IP4s7081758@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20030206224455.B78590@espresso.q9media.com> <200302071825.h17IP4s7081758@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <200302071825.h17IP4s7081758@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> writes:
: I think that, if we had some help from the compiler, it ought to be
: possible to implement FLT_EVAL_METHOD == 2 for i386, and that's
: probably the closest to the actual hardware implementation. Something
: similar to Kahan's PARANOIA ought to be able to distinguish the
: various methods and thereby serve as a regression test.
What's FLT_EVAL_METHOD == 2 mean?
I'd love to make the long doubles actually have their full range by
default.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030207.151652.38309440.imp>