Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:35:22 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build options for kernel modules Message-ID: <20030321153522.GD15185@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > answer from someone who has the information. >=20 > As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the > kernel for the only reason of keeping their mutual interfaces in > sync, has a source file defining such an interface changed. Is > there currently no way to go further and affect a kernel module's > built-in features with kernel config file options, besides modifying > makefiles in /sys/modules? >=20 There is. It's called ``makeoptions''. It's passed to both kernel and modules builds. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ezE6Ukv4P6juNwoRAp+rAJ9VDor4fjSPT7BTOyMyFSXW5c2qzACggOEk yuXajneqZ0ugZu1Exl1fRyQ= =GjTa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030321153522.GD15185>