Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:52:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstack protector Message-ID: <20030419094540.V87664@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com> In-Reply-To: <20030419081650.GA92898@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch> <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com> <20030418173713.C87664@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com> <20030419081650.GA92898@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Yes, it was to do with module loading. I think the XFree86 module
> build ignored CFLAGS, so the modules were not built with
> -fstack-protector.
The modules use MODCFLAGS and MODULE_CFLAGS instead. I'm familair with
the XFree86 loader, and would be willing to work with someone familiar with
the -fstack-protector part to fix this.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030419094540.V87664>