Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 11:18:36 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR with -current Message-ID: <20030508.111836.130233489.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <20030508.124929.74756191.haro@kgt.co.jp> <20030508.102242.72244093.imp@bsdimp.com> <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <16058.36990.299231.566625@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:
:
: M. Warner Losh writes:
: > In message: <20030508.124929.74756191.haro@kgt.co.jp>
: > Munehiro Matsuda <haro@kgt.co.jp> writes:
: > : Hi all,
: > :
: > : I got this LOR with today's -current, when I tried to start X Window up.
: > :
: > : lock order reversal
: > : 1st 0xc30b94c0 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:507
: > : 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:325
: >
: > That reminds me, would anybody object if I were to hack traceback so
: > that it would actually put the traceback in the dmesg buffer when not
: > called from ddb?
:
: FWIW, I think that tracebacks generated from DDB_TRACE should also
: go into the dmesg buffer. It would save quite a few initial exchanges
: with users..
Does anybdoy know why the ddb output doesn't go into the dmesg buffer
in general? It sure would save me a lot of grief as well if it did.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030508.111836.130233489.imp>