Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 02:51:27 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely9.cicely.de> To: Marcin Dalecki <mdcki@gmx.net> Cc: "Yevmenkin, Maksim" <Maksim.Yevmenkin@cw.com> Subject: Re: USB link cable? Message-ID: <20030511005127.GD1922@cicely9.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <3EBD2F95.9090807@gmx.net> References: <2E7E8A35375D1449A6F28D5E022E67310AC4D2@USSC8MS04.Global.Cwintra.Com> <3EBD2F95.9090807@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 06:57:57PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Yevmenkin, Maksim wrote: > > >this will create virtual ng0 network interface, which is different from > >virtual > >*ethernet* interface. if you need virtual *ethernet* interface you will > >need > >to use ng_eiface(4) module instead of ng_iface(4), i.e. > > > ># ngctl mkpeer udbp0: eiface data ether > > > >this will create virtual ngethX *ethernet* interface. > > Right now my USB link cable stopped to work at all on the > BSD side. I mean it stopped to work *permanently*. Neither > BSD Linux nor Windwos XP recon it any more as a proper USB > device. However they still detect that there is something > there. Detecting is just a 1,5k Ohm resistor - no active electonic required for that. > **** READ - the hardware BROKE DOWN PERMANENTLY **** > > Excellent isn't it? I really doubt that the udbp driver is guilty of this. An USB driver has no chance to break a device permanently by accident unless it has a very broken design. What does FreeBSD tell you now on probing the device? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030511005127.GD1922>