Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:16:46 +0900 From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.1-BETA umount problems Message-ID: <20030519131646J.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200305190317.h4J3H0M7066994@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20030518225640.S28986@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <200305190317.h4J3H0M7066994@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
truckman> IMHO, "umount -f /lib" should have failed in this case. I don't think so. -f means 'force', so it should be successed even if this cause something trouble to running system. If it would be unacceptable, there's easy way to solve it: don't use -f anymore, or add a new umount(8) option to do that. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519131646J.matusita>