Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:27:06 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8 Message-ID: <200305301727.06623.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpr86ib50f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305221020170.82473-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org> <xzpr86ib50f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> writes:
> > However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of
> > code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the
> > sake of a compiler upgrade isn't acceptable. Sounds like the GCC
> > guys have been bitten by the Linux bug.
>
> May I remind you that K&R-style declarations have been deprecated for
> the last 14 years?
Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were
still supported.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305301727.06623.wes>