Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 02:29:47 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: Maxim Mazurok <maxim@km.ua> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional com-port Message-ID: <20030614002946.GG7279@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20030614002429.GN338@km.ua> References: <20030613210519.GH338@km.ua> <20030613224912.GB7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613225959.GI338@km.ua> <20030613230232.GJ338@km.ua> <20030613232116.GC7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613233057.GM338@km.ua> <20030613235336.GF7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030614002429.GN338@km.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:24:29AM +0300, Maxim Mazurok wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:53:37AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > >> >What is wrong with the second onboard serial? > >> >You just have to remove the flags which declare it to be a special > >> >debug interface for to kernel. > >> >See sio(4) manpage for details on flags. > >> > >> hmmm > >> sio2 - it's no traditional com-port > >> it's ISA Cisco router console (cisco AP-EC) > >> i no need second onboard com-port, but i need access to cisco console > > > >And you can't just give it another IRQ? > > in SRM for onboard ports? You can check for, but I doubt that it's supported. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030614002946.GG7279>