Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:28:20 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> Subject: Re: rescue/ broke cross compiles Message-ID: <20030630222820.GV70590@roark.gnf.org> In-Reply-To: <20030630222353.GH57432@sunbay.com> References: <20030630222353.GH57432@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--P2Q/RrmTZI8TdTk+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:23:53AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi there! >=20 > As seen by the latest series of tinderbox failures, > the rescue/ stuff breaks cross compiles. The problem > is that some bits like bin/sh have the so-called > "build tools". These are small utilities not normally > visible in the world except during the build stage. > As such, "make buildworld" builds them in the native > host's environment (using the host compiler, headers, > libraries, and binutils). The /rescue should have > such a target too (build-tools), that would in effect > call the build-tools targets in all makefiles that > have it, e.g. bin/sh/Makefile. I'm the first to admit my Make-foo is lacking. I'm not sure I understand why /rescue needs build-tools bits. Can you help enlighten me? -gordon --P2Q/RrmTZI8TdTk+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/ALmDRu2t9DV9ZfsRAiIsAKCAcZrAapN/IV5CtS58IVvNDiuvzwCfeJat A+5bPYZUFRDQcvgnAhxK9S4= =BTiZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P2Q/RrmTZI8TdTk+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030630222820.GV70590>