Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 19:03:14 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Philippe Charnier <charnier@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd lpd.c ... Message-ID: <20030708190219.B10890@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <p05210653bb2f6045b577@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200307061244.h66CiBqg079835@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030707003216.GI72093@elvis.mu.org> <20030707200516.E7247@gamplex.bde.org> <p05210653bb2f6045b577@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 8:15 PM +1000 7/7/03, Bruce Evans wrote: > >On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > >> [ ignoring that question for the moment, why would I want > >> to define __FBSDID as 'struct __hack'? ] > > > >You would have to define it as something non-null (if you didn't > >remove it), since defining it to null would give a syntax error > >for the ";" following it (if you didn't remove this instead). > > Ah. Hmm. I notice that in sys/cdefs.h we do use 'struct __hack' > for __FBSDID, but not for the do-nothing versions of __RCSID, > __SCCSID, __COPYRIGHT, etc. Excellent. This shows that these bogus macros were not meant to be used :-). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030708190219.B10890>