Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:42:29 +0400 From: Alexey Neyman <alex.neyman@auriga.ru> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Things to remove from /rescue Message-ID: <200307231042.29371.alex.neyman@auriga.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030722153056.GM863@starjuice.net> References: <20030719171138.GA86442@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030722151138.GB72888@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030722153056.GM863@starjuice.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, there! On Tuesday 22 July 2003 19:30, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I don't see this as an unreasonable requirement, and I can't see what > great cost it incurs that would motivate us to remove support for it. Can't all this be done in a "user needs it, user adds it" fashion? E.g., to add /etc/rescue.mk that will be .include'd in src/rescue/rescue/Makefile, adding the required binaries to the CRUNCH_PROGS_bin, CRUNCH_PROG_sbin, CRUNCH_LIBS lists? E.g: --- /etc/rescue.mk --- CRUNCH_PROGS_sbin += chown This will allow the "base" list to be trimmed to some minimalist level, and will still allow the users to add whatever they [think they] need to restore their system. Regards, Alexey. -- A quoi ca sert d'etre sur la terre Si c'est pour faire nos vies a genoux?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307231042.29371.alex.neyman>