Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:17:44 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: chris@behanna.org, behanna@behanna.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom? Message-ID: <20030724.221744.66191711.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com> References: <20030723223007.AD92C5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com>
Chris BeHanna <behanna@behanna.org> writes:
: Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different
frequencies that are real no-nos in other regulatory domains and
they'd need to document how to properly generate the RF in both
cases.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030724.221744.66191711.imp>