Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:01:34 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: realpath(3) et al Message-ID: <20030812200134.GC51604@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <005901c360c6$a257a5b0$9f8d2ed5@internal> References: <20030812113147.GA1022@FreeBSD.org> <005901c360c6$a257a5b0$9f8d2ed5@internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0200, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > However, it is also one that > will boost the image of FreeBSD as well as make it more accepted by > third-party auditors (who I'd also like to see audit FreeBSD). Who are these `third-party auditors'? > Additionally (and somewhat unrelated), Linux was recently audited and given > the status "very secure". REALLY? Wow, ``very secure''!! I'm switching!! (Tongue-in-cheek) I think we'd need deep pockets for just about ANY kind of useful certification, security-related or not. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030812200134.GC51604>