Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:21:31 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan <ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com>, java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ant script annoyances Message-ID: <200309111621.31123.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030911141020.GB22265@watt.intra.caraldi.com> References: <20030909215210.GA5404@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <200309111110.42838.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20030911141020.GB22265@watt.intra.caraldi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The algorithm/script fragment that adds FreeBSD-specific jars to the > classpath is interesting *also* outside of Ant. Why not extract that > part and make it a shell script that could even be sourced within Ant if > the specific env variable is set? You are right. We should indeed provide a separate script for this. Question is how we distribute this script. But then it shouldn't be treated as part of Ant either. What if we make this a separate port, make Ant dependent on it, and *also* change the ant shell script to recognize an environment variable that will make it call that script? Ernst
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309111621.31123.ernst.dehaan>