Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:38:58 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.9 stability update Message-ID: <20030921133858.GG342@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20030920234025.AA15D2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> References: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> <20030920234025.AA15D2A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
> Scott Long wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. The
> > belief is that the last of the PAE-induced instability was resolved on
> > August 31. Is anyone still experiencing unusual crashes, corruption,
> > etc, on a system that is running with up-to-date sources? Now is the
> > time to speak up and get the problems resolved so that we can make the
> > deadline by next weekend. Any new testing would be highly appreciated,
> > especially in reduced-memory configurations and of course >4GB PAE
> > configurations.
I have a machine with 20MB of memory which consistently panics when running
"portsdb -Uu". So far I haven't captured one with a matching debug kernel,
a situation which I've now corrected. One thing of note is that so far all
the vmcores have been exactly the same size (a number which I also forget at
present). Now that I've gotten the machine setup with a debug kernel and
matching source I'm going to trigger a few panics and post results here. That
will take a while (~5 hours per panic; it's a slow machine).
Ceri
--
User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR?
Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment.
-- www.chatterboxchallenge.com
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/banyocfcwTS3JF8RAv6MAKC8SnXlFuNYT3ClUwATTSmuJ/iwbgCfdG2i
41/OjBmj1KwTNS5rKHoIKfI=
=IRId
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921133858.GG342>