Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:00:10 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtsock.c: eliminate masking of gotos, don't abuse M_RTABLE Message-ID: <20031003080010.GF53479@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20031003023838.I16042@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20031003070031.GL5194@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031003023838.I16042@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:40:22AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >=20 > > Comments? > > > > BMS >=20 > I think that anything to clean up the routing table is a good idea... > however, aren't there a few major non-committed patches to this area which > are almost ready? (Sam's locking, someone else's moving cloned routes > into a tcpstatcache, more?) You should probably check on the status of > those projects first and make sure that you won't interfere with their > integration. >=20 I think these uncommitted patches will mostly affect route.c, while this patch is for rtsock.c, the route(4) interface with the kernel, which is unlikely to change a lot. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/fSyKUkv4P6juNwoRAiBIAJ9bhLY2Gw+ruy1RAA28uV5JvKA1bACgiw5H 5kimAAiWblCgmcEFxbItb7s= =dJIs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l+goss899txtYvYf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031003080010.GF53479>