Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:33:10 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: joe@joe-lewis.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? Message-ID: <20031004203310.GA60712@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> References: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:12:53PM -0600, Joe Lewis wrote: > Question for you guru's; >=20 > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system.=20 > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM,=20 > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default as=20 > static. This means I PAM is now AM, because nothing is pluggable. And= =20 > the documentation on getting a 3rd party module to work is like slitting= =20 > your wrists and doing pushups in salt water. Well, gee, I feel motivated to help you. You've made a number of incorrect assertions, and insulted the developers to boot. Good luck figuring out your own problems. Kris --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/fy6GWry0BWjoQKURAmVfAJ94BsP6Y0EjzWr558C8rWSdmscCSwCffjBH PLDcZLIPfa4/kDZh0N1Cl44= =G2eX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031004203310.GA60712>