Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 06:50:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <root@pukruppa.de> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnomemeeting port fails Message-ID: <20031005063456.H700@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <1065312669.27243.35.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20031004200652.J700@pukruppa.net> <1065292202.27243.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1065299097.27243.23.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <oprwjjtqql8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <1065312669.27243.35.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> Exactly. The meta-ports aren't for everyone. They're for new users
> that just want to "fire and forget." In fact, I don't even install
> gnome2-fifth-toe. I just pick the ports I want, and go. If you had to
> have a meta-port, it's best to create your own using gnome2[-fifth-toe]
> as a model, stick it in ports/x11, and always build that one.
But that would be quite inefficient: You did all the work and I
do it again.
What about some mechanism that allows me to place a kind of
gnome-config file in my root directory, containing lines like
WITHOUT_GNOMEMEETING=YES
WITHOUT_BALSA=YES
???
So everyone could easily stay up to date using the metaports and
save build-time as well.
Uli.
+---------------------------+
| Peter Ulrich Kruppa |
| Wuppertal |
| Germany |
+---------------------------+
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031005063456.H700>