Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:16:28 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: quel@quelrod.net Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: usb 2.0 dell inspirion 8500 Message-ID: <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211509070.32752@quelrod.net> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211044430.27469@quelrod.net> <20031121200702.GD74178@cicely12.cicely.de> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211509070.32752@quelrod.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? It is intentionally not in GENERIC. > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > > > I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s > > > transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0: > > > usb0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> on uhci0 > > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > > usb1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> on uhci1 > > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > > usb2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> on uhci2 > > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > > > > > (Yes i double checked my laptop does indeed have usb 2.0) > > > > > > I saw that ehci had usb 2.0 support comitted. Is this coming for uhci? I > > > suppose it's too late to get this into 5.2 -RELEASE. > > > > uhci is strictly an usb1.x controller. > > Build a kernel with ehci support if you have a high speed capable > > controller. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031121211627.GF74178>