Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:19:31 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:
:
: M. Warner Losh writes:
: > In message: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
: > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:
: > : I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss or
: > : ldap.
: >
: > I'll bet a larger percentage of the people are ignoring this thread
: > than reading it since it has been so devoid of concrete numbers.
:
: Aside from $SUBJECT..
I'm just saying that most of the developers I'm talking to on IRC say
this tread is insane, has no content and they are blowing it off
because of that. A concrete, real benchmark will go a long way
towards changing that. Until then, you are as good as kill filed.
I don't say this to be mean or nasty. I'm just saying that people are
sick to death of the arguing without any real facts.
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124.191931.67791612.imp>