Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:35:35 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1 Message-ID: <200311301235.42303@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> References: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> <20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sunday 30 November 2003 09:59, Nakata Maho wrote: > Hi, Harald > > > Hello dear OpenOffice port maintainers, > > > > I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between the > > linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386). > > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the > > Linux version takes about 5 seconds. > > > > If some of you speak german please also have a look at: > > http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2177 > > Hmm I don't understand German...sad. > Anyway it takes about 10 seconds for me to start OOo > Pentium 4B, 2.4G... Eh, we don't have that fast machines;) The conclusion of the german thread is that there are lots of people confirming that enormuous difference. Don't know about their machines, I'm talking about 1,1Celeron,i815,256MB,IDE But it doesn' matter how long it takes to start, the emu-port is MUCH faster. I heard that it's also true for operation, but I haven't tried. Thanks, -Harry > > --maho [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/ydYNBylq0S4AzzwRAqtnAKCIcO4L03ghXnEHRjBpv8PkUinjkwCfSjJQ BOigWEKP0kxsvvfxX1BlYkQ= =mjnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311301235.42303>