Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:01:37 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: support for __thread Message-ID: <20031222060137.GA87552@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312212347130.27570-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20031222010257.GY60229@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312212347130.27570-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Dec 22), Daniel Eischen said: > I'd like to stay away from maintaining libc_r any further; not that > it can't be done, but with libkse and libthr around, why? Do gdb and pstack (in ports) handle libkse or libthr threads? libc_r is a great debugging tool, if nothing else. I can't even attach to a libkse-threaded program with gdb; the tracee gets SIGSTOP'ped, and gdb just sits there. You have to kill -9 gdb from another tty, and the tracee dies. gdb can attach to a libc_r program, view all the threads, and detach without affecting the tracee. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031222060137.GA87552>