Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:33:45 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely12.cicely.de Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices. Message-ID: <20040105.163345.129782176.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040105.162427.30502300.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
: > Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: > : The point is that it shouldn't take an IRQ for PCI which is configured
: > : for an ISA device in device.hints.
: >
: > We don't do that.
:
: We do!
:
: /boot/device.hints:
: hint.sio.0.irq="4"
:
: pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 4
: pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD routed to irq 4
Ah, I see what you are saying. That would be hard to implement.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105.163345.129782176.imp>