Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:31:08 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com> Cc: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I Can't See The Image Message-ID: <20040112193108.GF61781@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <4002F108.1584.1099550F@localhost> References: <4002F108.1584.1099550F@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:10:00PM -0000, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: Hi Sabahattin, > I'm trying to use the web-based Send-PR interface which is asking me for= =20 > the text characters corresponding to an image to ensure that I'm not a=20 > robot. I am merely inhuman. :-) I'm totally blind, so can't see your=20 > image. I have a completed form here, the contents of which I'll include= =20 > in this email in case this form doesn't make it through submission. Sorr= y=20 > if it looks bad. It looks fine; I'll file it for you, as this whole situation is pretty much down to me. I knew that users with impaired vision would have a problem with this (which is why I included the "mail bugbusters" ALT tag), but figured that it was better than the previous situation, which was having zero web-based mechanism for bug reporting whatsoever. I do like the suggestion for using a maths problem; that's very neat. Are there other verification mechanisms that you could recommend? Also, looking at the filled out form you've submitted below, I'm guessing that a major annoyance with image based verification is that you get no indication that this is necessary until you've filled in the form - would it be of use (in general) for websites to state at the top of a form that you'll need to be able to see images later on? Regarding your observation that robots would be expected to be abusing an email based system anyway, I agree that you would expect that to be true, but our experience shows that this doesn't hold. No idea why. Apologies for the problems you had with the form, and I'll certainly look into other mechanisms for doing this verification. Cheer, Ceri FreeBSD Bugmeister --=20 --Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAvX8ocfcwTS3JF8RAiszAJ9Yr7kiB3TeDRVK8nBhEbcr0hyovgCcCxeV mAU2B+dN4OcF/wIarETNEaY= =350l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040112193108.GF61781>