Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:23:49 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Rich Hampton <rich@hamptonhouse.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: syscons on U10 /w Creator Message-ID: <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <400613C4.1090105@hamptonhouse.org> References: <4005FFC9.20308@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115031013.GA52532@xor.obsecurity.org> <400613C4.1090105@hamptonhouse.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote: > Of course, I didn't think that had anything to do with it but when the > order was exactly as above, the compile finished without error. So > then, I went back to the original order and recompiled again and it > finished without error. I don't know what's going on at this point. I > think I had the uart before sc, or something to that effect. Hmm, that's pretty weird..I didn't think the order of entries mattered in kernel configurations. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABhXUWry0BWjoQKURAmdPAKCcngli/sxNlcM6xX3NdLmLRAOMFQCgwD9t YtK7hSWJ3jqhlZBYbApIibE= =pmLL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115042349.GA55653>