Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:37:36 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: freebsd 4.9 alpha ports link points into i386 tree ? Message-ID: <20040122023736.GA47498@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221231130.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221124120.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122014706.GA46878@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221231130.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:33:02PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > The ports tree is the same for all architectures..there's no point in > > duplicating it. > > ah, in that case it has been duplicated in every architecture and every > separate release tree. > > so should the actual behaviour on disk be: > > o ports directory in releases/i386/X.X-RELEASE/ > o symlink from releases/$arch/X.X-RELEASE/ports to point back into the > i386 ports directory of the same release ? Isn't that what you described? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFADzdwWry0BWjoQKURAovPAJ9rgekHVqo0T/UdCRVVNpd/w3OLwACfQKVE +Fh+AaAvD4usX380DhjGU7o= =qn9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040122023736.GA47498>