Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:28:13 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BGP4 using FreeBSD Message-ID: <20040125092813.GE987@complx.LF.net> In-Reply-To: <40132999.3020906@keystreams.com> References: <4012E087.4080504@mr0vka.eu.org> <4012E2F2.2000108@keystreams.com> <20040124215019.GD987@complx.LF.net> <40132999.3020906@keystreams.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > >Disks were never the relevant topic. Basically, those systems > >just worked. Yes, they need a little hand-holding, but not because > >of the disks. > Well that may be, but why risk having a hard drive go out? Flash memory > most definatley outlasts traditional hard drives. See the discussioon nanog about this, a few days ago. http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/ The problem with flash is that has its part of wear and tear as well. It's not easy to do a real read-only setup. If you don't, some part of the flash do will wear out. Flash mem do has a finite number of possible writes. -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 16 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi@LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040125092813.GE987>