Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:27:22 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: JADETEX Message-ID: <20040216122721.GB617@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20040216.212410.27780203.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <4030A639.7010106@FreeBSD.org> <20040216.212410.27780203.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:24:10PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> wrote > in <4030A639.7010106@FreeBSD.org>: >=20 > ale> A recent commit to bsd.docbook.mk sets the JADETEX variable and use = it=20 > ale> to build the ps/pdf docs. The problem arises when a user sets=20 > ale> JADETEX=3Dyes in his make.conf to install the docproj port with Jade= TeX.=20 >=20 > Sorry, I did not notice this problem when I committed the change. >=20 > Renaming JADETEX, TEX, and so on in doc.docbook.mk to something like > JADETEX_BIN, or renaming JADETEX to WITH_JADETEX in docproj port. > I personally think renaming the variables in doc.docbook.mk is better > since there is few people who redefining *TEX in doc.docbook.mk. > If there is no strong objection, I will work on it. I think the ports system generally uses FOO_CMD, so it would be nice to use the same. Ceri --=20 --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAMLcpocfcwTS3JF8RAiXCAKCPrPzuk0w2dTmaUfzO0dECPp96wwCeKYnB GiUHO0O1vUL8fSzpfI2ZrmU= =E/a3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040216122721.GB617>