Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:57:34 -0500 From: Tony Holmes <tony@crosswinds.net> To: Simon Dick <simond@irrelevant.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tpop3d experience ? Message-ID: <20040325085734.A34287@crosswinds.net> In-Reply-To: <1080213028.94023.16.camel@localhost>; from simond@irrelevant.org on Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:10:28AM %2B0000 References: <20040321202625.GR7109@complx.LF.net> <20040322142823.GA32786@ns2.wananchi.com> <20040324145054.K23306@thunder.xecu.net> <1080213028.94023.16.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On +Mar 25, Simon Dick wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:54, Andy Dills wrote: > > > > For what it's worth, qmail's pop3d is also pretty solid. Very small, very > > lightweight, and you get to write your own password authentication if you > > want. > > > > For an MTA however, I don't use qmail, I use postfix (but with maildir). > > > > Although, this thread has convinced me to try out tpop3d...I'll definitely > > give it a look. > > Give teapop a look too, I find that works very well too I'll chime in with my vote for teapop as well. I've been using it for a couple years now with postfix in mbox/maildir in passwd/mysql/pgsql auth modes. I've had no operational issues or failures in my time in using it. *knock on wood* -- Tony Holmes Founder and Senior Systems Architect Crosswinds Internet Communications Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325085734.A34287>