Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:22:05 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? Message-ID: <20040326232205.GD57192@sirius.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20040327013730.F96451@avim.ciam.ru> References: <opr5eiuf0f8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <c3uoks$193u$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru> <c3v3kn$1drs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20040327013730.F96451@avim.ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:41:30AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: >=20 > > * Will Andrews: > > > > > MAINTAINER=3D email@address Name1 Name2 Name3 ... > > > > > > ... this will still allow programs that interpret MAINTAINER directly > > > by taking the second field (whitespace delimiter) to work correctly, > > > and makes writing said function simple. > > > > FWIW, there is also the Usenet notation: > > > > MAINTAINER=3D login@domain.com (FirstName LastName) >=20 > IMHO the best is: FirstName LastName <login@domain.com> > This notation should be passed to MTA and most MUA without modification > AFAIK. The reason I suggested the first syntax is so just the email address could be simply parsed. regards, --=20 wca --0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAZLsdF47idPgWcsURAovPAJ97dZPdCXDYMnMCkhKwg7KABIKpKwCdG1q0 +3xcFzgU9N9zm5f2qaCsLCo= =Uh1E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326232205.GD57192>