Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 May 2004 13:06:57 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Gerrit Nagelhout <gnagelhout@sandvine.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance
Message-ID:  <20040504200657.GA22430@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337021AB372@mail.sandvine.com>
References:  <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337021AB372@mail.sandvine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:55:32PM -0400, Gerrit Nagelhout wrote:

> I would like to move to CURRENT for new hardware support, and the=20
> ability to properly use multi-threading in user-space, but can't do
> this until the performance bottlenecks are solved.  I realize that=20
> 5.x is still a work in progress and hasn't been tuned as well as 4.7=20
> yet, but are there any plans for optimizations in this area?  Does=20
> anyone have any suggestions on what else I can try?

Try rwatson's netperf patches:

  http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/

There is at least one outstanding panic condition known, but more
testing will be a great help.

Kris

P.S. You didn't mention the status of WITNESS, but I'm assuming you
read the docs and disabled it since it's a huge performance killer.

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAl/fgWry0BWjoQKURAo6NAKCpSrIci6XpEto7PzwSsyTbkab3VACgg33M
7PUj5HR8E8mz1wM2MaoNx2E=
=xxOy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040504200657.GA22430>