Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:09:47 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: platanthera <platanthera@web.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COPTFLAGS (not?) only for compiling the kernel? Message-ID: <20040513230947.GB22583@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200405140112.41576.platanthera@web.de> References: <200405132329.07892.platanthera@web.de> <20040513224856.GB19453@xor.obsecurity.org> <200405140112.41576.platanthera@web.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:12:41AM +0200, platanthera wrote: > On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wrote: > > > [/etc/make.conf] > > > ... > > > # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should > > > use # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel > > > builds anyway). # There is very little to gain by using higher > > > optimization levels, and doing # so can cause problems. > > > # > > > COPTFLAGS= [whatever] > > > ... > > > > > > just the kernel... sounds like COPTFLAGS setting should not effect > > > world or port builds, but apparently it does. > > > > It shouldn't, CFLAGS is used for that. > > > > Kris > > > I'm just compiling koffice and it looks like COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > overrides the koffice defaults (no CFLAGS defined in make.conf). The default CFLAGS value *is* "-O -pipe". Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFApAA7Wry0BWjoQKURAum2AJ9WdFHwA7U71MQdt3RfexIWF59/ywCg/JkG /CBQSUh+fDeu0g+idUFZH3o= =HZ49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040513230947.GB22583>