Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:15:05 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: <section> vs. <sectN> Message-ID: <20040730141505.GV424@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20040728205248.GI424@submonkey.net> References: <20040728205248.GI424@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:52:48PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > Which of these do we prefer? > > 1) <section> > <para>foo</para> > <section> > <para>bar</para> > </section> > </section> > > 2) <sect1> > <para>foo</para> > <sect2> > <para>bar</para> > </sect2> > </sect1> > > This is basically a style issue, as DocBook does the same for both, so > whatever the outcome it should probably be added to the FDP. > > I'll note here that nearly all of our documents use #2 already; I am > working on one of the ones that doesn't. I sense a lack of consensus, so I won't change this particular document. Thanks all, Ceri -- It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBClfpocfcwTS3JF8RAkauAKC/W2Okz/4bbwON/iZ9Zp5B6akpoACfSJ9H 4ReY6hD6ZMlzwZXc6cPD/Lc= =lTpx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040730141505.GV424>