Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:48:29 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Tilman Linneweh <arved@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ar.4 missing Message-ID: <20040827184829.GE774@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <1093631012.634.5.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20040827180724.GZ24054@arved.at> <20040827182012.GD774@zaphod.nitro.dk> <1093631012.634.5.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.08.27 20:23:32 +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > Am Fr, den 27.08.2004 schrieb Simon L. Nielsen um 20:20: > > On 2004.08.27 20:07:25 +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > Noticed that ar.4 is missing, although mentioned in ata.4, please com= mit or > > > approve this small diff: > > >=20 > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/ar.diff > >=20 > > That's unfortunatly not the right solution... since we have another > > ar(4) device, which is a NIC driver: :-/ > >=20 > > ar -- synchronous Digi/Arnet device driver > >=20 > > It is very unfortunate IMO, but I think it's way to late to fix. >=20 > Oops, you are right, i was confused because the NIC driver is i386 only, > and i tried "man 4 ar" on amd64. > So maybe add the MLINKS only on !i386? I'm not really sure if that would break POLA (as in, confusing people more). I have CC'ed ru, perhaps he (or someone else) has a good idea on how to make this situation better. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBL4H9h9pcDSc1mlERAsLPAKCn+8RQ9QdUiJgwgwHniljlG1HPVgCeMU8c 4OFeDId28Mdnr70HhkybgVY= =dQj7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Pql8miugIZX0722--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040827184829.GE774>