Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:28:02 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr> Subject: Re: Re(3): panic: sorele Message-ID: <200409271628.02524.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924134957.82478H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :) > > > > It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding > > kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the > > message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is > > reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as > > well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging > > information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract > > debugging information per the Handbook?) > > I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either... > When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error > > Options Added: > > options INVARIANTS > options KDB > options DDB INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409271628.02524.jhb>