Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:24:18 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default Message-ID: <20040929032418.GD56445@horsey.gshapiro.net> In-Reply-To: <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg> References: <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an > extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional > benefit would be obtained. > > Of course, if someone else finds the time to implement this, I will give > it a serious look. I'm not _opposed_ to the idea. If someone does so, please make it optional as jails don't support IPv6 yet and BIND 9 does.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040929032418.GD56445>