Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:17:38 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: Vlad <marchenko@gmail.com> Cc: Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> Subject: Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1 Message-ID: <20041008031737.GA1027@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20041007191757.GB73261@green.homeunix.org> References: <20041006090104.06710d85.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006154137.GJ47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041006203220.7f8e7b8a.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006192518.GM47017@green.homeunix.org> <cd70c681041006125527e69bcd@mail.gmail.com> <20041006215134.GN47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041007010008.15274fbd.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041007181852.GA73261@green.homeunix.org> <cd70c681041007121113048277@mail.gmail.com> <20041007191757.GB73261@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:17:57PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:11:48PM -0400, Vlad wrote: > > Brian, > > > > thanks for your work. Question: is this patch is something I can feel > > comfortable about trying it on a production server? Did you test it? > > It is completely untested other than compilation. I don't have my SMP > machine with console in front of me to be able to try to reproduce the > problem, but I believe these changes to be relatively safe. Okay, now I do; I did a more thorough potential fix -- so if that worked for you, this should do the same without a socket memory leak. The life and times of sockets are fraught with peril... <URL:http://green.homeunix.org/~green/tcp_accept_race_crash.patch>; -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041008031737.GA1027>