Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:08:45 +0300 From: Vladimir Terziev <vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quagga & ripd difficulty Message-ID: <20041021100845.4ae38f61@daemon.cmotd.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0410201615050.87738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20041019180042.553c1af0@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041019163128.GA1201@grosbein.pp.ru> <20041020164004.6e0c3414@daemon.cmotd.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0410201615050.87738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why do you think vtun is not secure ? On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > > > In fact i can't even predict the name of the interface via which the traffic will be routed, because my VPN is based on VTUN servers. They choose the next free tun device, respectively interface, when the VPN connection is established beteen 2 peers. > > use sth like > device tun1; > in your vtun config. > > PS: vtun is not secure ! > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041021100845.4ae38f61>