Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:08:17 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5. > Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it? ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based USB2 disk enclosure. BMS --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFBgfpwueUpAYYNtTsRAkjSAKCc/WSR9ztfA4ykxHELlQYCXo5wxQCePNlU UfFBeQWW4U/+BdCRxJarUKI= =Wc1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041029080817.GB728>