Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:14 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 Message-ID: <200411031036.17792.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 November 2004 17:48, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that > don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet > optimization. On the technical end of things, what exactly is it that causes problems wit= h=20 higher-level optimizations? Are they due to bugs in GCC, or obfuscated=20 code that can be interpreted several ways? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBBiQkB5sRg+Y0CpvERAgApAJ4uzYVFodMzvBmpCu0y8TMaVqtdwQCdFTNT +MZ/dxqnTwaMyLINkpJWolA= =fXxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411031036.17792.kirk>