Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:16:51 +0800 From: plasma <plasma@ms9.hinet.net> To: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [speedstep] Testers wanted Message-ID: <20041123121651.GA871@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <20041123102712.GD4353@poupinou.org> References: <20041122084814.GA1358@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> <20041122100701.GE33509@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> <20041122121210.GA857@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> <20041122122827.GH33509@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> <20041122144407.GA821@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> <20041122184414.GL33509@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> <20041123065935.GB20758@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> <20041123093420.GB4353@poupinou.org> <20041123100834.GA72233@plasmanb.plasma.idv.tw> <20041123102712.GD4353@poupinou.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:27:12AM +0100, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > There are some API in kernel in order to detect power profile changes > (performance vs economy). When Nate will polish his cpufreq, this will > be done in a generic way. But in the meantime, it may be helpfull to > implement that in ichist so that we don't have to care about AC changes > via acpi or apm. This sounds good! Should I just poll a sysctl variable periodically, or ...? Anyway, I've wrote a test version, which is available at http://svn.ntcu.net/~plasma/ichctrl-ac_test.tar.gz. The size is 2697, and the md5 b5604f66f949a89afaca8cd4535c7ece. This version will try to use ACPI then APM to check AC line status. plasma
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041123121651.GA871>