Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:28:55 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port make index (was: Re: make -j$n buildworld : use of -j investigated) Message-ID: <20041125092855.GA64481@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <opsh0jp9ge8527sy@smtp.local> References: <41A2C5C0.3080908@yahoo.com> <2566.10.0.0.26.1101241872.squirrel@10.0.0.26> <41A3EA0F.3080500@yahoo.com> <41A58766.8030607@yahoo.com> <opsh0jp9ge8527sy@smtp.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: > Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more = =20 > io bound? > I can't test this myself, because my laptop is to slow for making these = =20 > tests any fun. Based on my tests, 'make index' is only faster with -j on smp machines (the default is -j2, which only penalizes UP by a second or two, but nearly halves the build time on an smp machine). Kris --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBpaXXWry0BWjoQKURApquAKDO5TLQjYcMqcd14kWEnfAmOzFqygCeKZ1+ rUUSVNmaEhbkbLyImOarIt0= =2KgJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041125092855.GA64481>