Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:57:35 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Matt Dawson <matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MFCs? Message-ID: <20050101125734.GF761@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <200501011217.13171.matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk> References: <200501011217.13171.matt@mattsnetwork.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.01.01 12:17:13 +0000, Matt Dawson wrote: > Is there any chance we will see the new ath, 802.11 and ITE (Gigabyte) R= AID=20 > MFC'd into 5.x sometime in the future, or is this new stuff going to mean= =20 > running -CURRENT? Sam has already said that the wlan parts will not be MFC'ed since they break the API/ABI. I would suspect (read I don't know for sure and it's S=F8ren's call) that the ata changes are going to MFC'ed, but since there are some quirks in the ata code in CURRENT at the moment, which are being worked on, I wouldn't hold my breath for the MFC. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB1p4+h9pcDSc1mlERAusfAKC6Axy97SLaqGk1Km654+PJCZBDaQCfaUM7 3Mj4GUZ0fUlOB/9tD0e+s+o= =0kRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050101125734.GF761>