Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:43:07 +0100 (CET)
From:      Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Borja Marcos <borjamar@sarenet.es>
Subject:   Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20050202124154.Q11339@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050202113202.68249E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050202113202.68249E-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote:

RW>
RW>On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote:
RW>
RW>> 	I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description
RW>> to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different
RW>> processes. I've seen that top uses p_runtime (FreeBSD 5 and FreeBSD 4),
RW>> but I'm not sure if the value would be really useful. 
RW>
RW>This is very cool. :-)  How are you currently extracting the information? 
RW>One of the things I've wanted to do for a while is make sure all this sort
RW>of thing is exposed via snmpd so that the information can be gathered
RW>easily across a large number of hosts (say, 10,000).

That could be a nice JUH (junior userspace hacker's) task to add a module 
to bsnmp.

harti



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050202124154.Q11339>