Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:09 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: feedback on a good DNS server Message-ID: <200503092108.13271.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <422F7212.4080601@cloudview.com> References: <a82b9719050309131024a32b53@mail.gmail.com> <0FB997694448EE4FF1EFE202@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <422F7212.4080601@cloudview.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 March 2005 04:00 pm, John Pettitt wrote: > The argument against DJBDNS comes down to a) DJB annoys a lot of people > and b) some of those people thinkg DJBDNS is not standards compliant. Erm, "b" is definitely true. It doesn't support IXFR or NOTIFY, so if you= =20 plan on slaving another zone (or having another server slave one of your=20 zones), then you're expected to install rsync and get your peer to do the=20 same. Oh, and c) djbdns isn't Free or Open Source by any definition of=20 either phrase. That's not important to some people, but others consider it= =20 kind of important. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCL7od5sRg+Y0CpvERAnvwAKCKrdHds4T+ksbzfXbKrE3VjI3xhgCfZU+U saOkWLHbRrw4mjjHYjEjzYc= =bRYn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5202772.fg7QbAcMH5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503092108.13271.kirk>