Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:48:14 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How does one know how many thread a process owns? Message-ID: <20050415104814.GA5278@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20050415055604.N93987@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> References: <c21e92e20504122232f568545@mail.gmail.com> <425CC7F8.3030803@samsco.org> <425CD009.6040208@freebsd.org> <c21e92e205041302152c9cbaaf@mail.gmail.com> <20050413132603.GA39006@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <425D2163.4090603@freebsd.org> <20050413140838.GA77217@renaissance.homeip.net> <20050413141957.GA40546@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050415055604.N93987@lexi.siliconlandmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-04-15 06:02, Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> wrote: > Please commit the following patch which unbreaks the display problems > which appear on 80-column terminals with the THR column (The D would wrap > and cause weird behavior): > > http://bling.properkernel.com/freebsd/top.machine.c.patch This seems reasonable. I only have UP machines, which don't need the change from COMMAND to CMD, but Andrey Chernov has already brought to my attention that adding the THR column broke the listing in SMP machines. David, do you think it's ok to change s/COMMAND/CMD/ or is that too silly to do to fit THR in there? I can probably reduce the columns of THR to 4 too, since I noticed that after 1500 threads the value of THR doesn't increase anymore here; so, being able to display up to 9999 threads is ok I guess.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050415104814.GA5278>