Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:04:59 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: /dev/null <null@dnswatch.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast Message-ID: <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:29:30PM -0700, /dev/null wrote: > needed. All in all life on 5.x and the "upgrade" wasn't too bad. I will > say that there is ONE issue that I have found and have not yet solved. It > now takes at least 2 times longer to build any of the ports. This is not a FreeBSD performance bug. FreeBSD 5.x uses gcc 3.x, which takes longer to compile code than gcc 2.x because it does much more optimization. > Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have evidence of this. Kris --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbDQqWry0BWjoQKURAoEDAKDsecGoOo5l4C4qNMFbueeiwKjGjwCfenPd 5NneMcPzbhx3AgKALVleld4= =pQcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425000459.GA28667>