Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 17:24:00 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: wi0 is always status: no carrier Message-ID: <200505221724.05548.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20941475b4d98a8a9743a4a7ce85a577@FreeBSD.org> References: <200505122236.14490.kirk@strauser.com> <20050513.235443.29330924.imp@bsdimp.com> <20941475b4d98a8a9743a4a7ce85a577@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Friday 20 May 2005 10:20 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > I have a patch to make the PIR code trust the BIOS in this case over the > $PIR table that you can test if you want. Actually, I committed the patch > finally a while ago. It is rev 1.117 in HEAD. It should backport to 5.x > directly. Try that and see if it fixes your problem. I wiped the drive and started over with a new install. Then, I applied your patch and rebooted into the new kernel. My dmesg output was identical between the two kernels (save for the normal little things like minor skew in clock rates). Pardon my ignorance, but should I be somehow requesting that my cbb device get bound to IRQ 11 instead of 10? There's no line containing "cbb" in /boot/device.hints; should I add one? -- Kirk Strauser [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCkQaF5sRg+Y0CpvERAqAJAKCUNYDva34GUepCmknJbppUhi4l2wCaAjPQ TuVHpdg5z3jjTS0c2O+9sLg= =237f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505221724.05548.kirk>