Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:19:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de> References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org> <42924949.1070902@incubus.de> <200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net> <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:18:54PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Max Laier wrote: >=20 > > I have seen this on my box. Disabling one of the USB-ports solved the= =20 > > problem. I was seeing very high IRQ-rates. Check $vmstat -i during th= e=20 > > process to see if you have abnormal high rate jumps. It might be that = we=20 > > must investigate some of our drivers to play nice with each other. >=20 > Interrupt rates were normal. But are any IRQs shared? Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCk4xeWry0BWjoQKURAr2wAKDUMD1ki5THiOPOdyy6dI9hO93PFQCfY164 11ZpXO94U4/AvFJadpF9Xkg= =0FxX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050524201942.GA28257>